I have a graduate student. Unfortunately I have to report here that the student stinks. No, not in research or teaching or anything. He literally stinks.
Yes, I have a student who comes to my office and can be there for some time to discuss research, teaching, courses etc. However, the student smells bad. Not that I poked my nose in him or something. One can breathe the foul smell meters away from the student and the whole room smells. Once the student leaves, my office smells and I have to sprinkle some air freshner to be able to breathe again.
I don't know what to do. Do I tell the student? Do I make someone else to tell the student? Or should I just remain quite and suffer for the next 5 years? Have you encountered such a situation before and what did you do?
p.s. I am laughing right now writing this but believe me I don't laugh when he is in my office
Friday, November 7, 2014
Thursday, October 30, 2014
How to design your academic job talk
These are the days when most of the faculty candidates who are fortunate to get invited are designing, and giving talks. I thought it might be a good idea to offer advice to those candidates since I am not sitting on the other side of the aisle. Mind that I used the same techniques to give talks.
1) Designing a talk for a broad audience is different from giving a talk in your department. The department that you are giving your talk in probably does not have any one who works in your sub-field (hence they are looking for a candidate who could do what you are doing). Therefore, you must assume that the audience knows very little about your sub field, the jargon that you use, and how good you are in your sub field. Therefore assume that the audience knows nothing !
2) Following from argument 1; You do not, and should not cover everything that you have done till now. If you are invited for a faculty interview there are at least couple of large projects that you have worked on. Pick the one that is most awesome (in terms of results) and is most likely to be fundable in the future as well.
3) Following from argument 2; After picking up the awesome-st project give a high-level outline of the research. That means a lot of cartoons and diagrams. Yes, people are sleeping and they are lazy. It is your job to make them understand what you have done. The best way to make them understand is using diagrams (fancy diagrams) and animations !. The audience will keep engaged and will likely to understand something from your talk. They will feel smart and hence will like you.
4) Show them some results. Then tell them what the results mean in the larger context. Telling me that you imroved the time of the algorithm or the purity of your sample does not means anything to me. Tell me that your improvement of time results in blah blah blah. Otherwise the results are meaningless.
5) You have published your papers; that means that you have proposed and did something useful that other people have not. Tell me by comparing your results with that of the competitors and show why yours are better.
6) Have multiple slides on your future work. I want to know that you have a solid plan to take your research ahead and that you know where to target for your funding.
7) Do not have text after text in your slides and then to explain to me what is written. The audience can read the text; they are here to listen to you.
1) Designing a talk for a broad audience is different from giving a talk in your department. The department that you are giving your talk in probably does not have any one who works in your sub-field (hence they are looking for a candidate who could do what you are doing). Therefore, you must assume that the audience knows very little about your sub field, the jargon that you use, and how good you are in your sub field. Therefore assume that the audience knows nothing !
2) Following from argument 1; You do not, and should not cover everything that you have done till now. If you are invited for a faculty interview there are at least couple of large projects that you have worked on. Pick the one that is most awesome (in terms of results) and is most likely to be fundable in the future as well.
3) Following from argument 2; After picking up the awesome-st project give a high-level outline of the research. That means a lot of cartoons and diagrams. Yes, people are sleeping and they are lazy. It is your job to make them understand what you have done. The best way to make them understand is using diagrams (fancy diagrams) and animations !. The audience will keep engaged and will likely to understand something from your talk. They will feel smart and hence will like you.
4) Show them some results. Then tell them what the results mean in the larger context. Telling me that you imroved the time of the algorithm or the purity of your sample does not means anything to me. Tell me that your improvement of time results in blah blah blah. Otherwise the results are meaningless.
5) You have published your papers; that means that you have proposed and did something useful that other people have not. Tell me by comparing your results with that of the competitors and show why yours are better.
6) Have multiple slides on your future work. I want to know that you have a solid plan to take your research ahead and that you know where to target for your funding.
7) Do not have text after text in your slides and then to explain to me what is written. The audience can read the text; they are here to listen to you.
Tuesday, October 14, 2014
Inviting a guest speaker
I have invited a guest speaker for a seminar in the department. This is my first independent invitation to a guest researcher at our institute ( actually this is my first ever independent invitation at any institute). Anyway the speaker has to drive 2 hours and I have been thinking about all the ways the visit can go.
For instance, I can have the seminar in the morning (10ish) and then make him meet my group, meet me, meet other faculty members and then take him to lunch and let him go.
OR
I could make him meet my group, meet other faculty members, then let him give the seminar and then take him to lunch and let him go.
Scenario 1 allow me to take a closer look at his work; will have a lot to talk about after the seminar (we have an overlap). But in this case I have a feeling that the speaker might want to just leave (he wont coz of the visit schedule).
In scenario 2, I wont know his work deeper but he would want to stay till noon-ish to give his talk and then lunch.
Which strategy do you use? and why?
For instance, I can have the seminar in the morning (10ish) and then make him meet my group, meet me, meet other faculty members and then take him to lunch and let him go.
OR
I could make him meet my group, meet other faculty members, then let him give the seminar and then take him to lunch and let him go.
Scenario 1 allow me to take a closer look at his work; will have a lot to talk about after the seminar (we have an overlap). But in this case I have a feeling that the speaker might want to just leave (he wont coz of the visit schedule).
In scenario 2, I wont know his work deeper but he would want to stay till noon-ish to give his talk and then lunch.
Which strategy do you use? and why?
Thursday, October 9, 2014
My students
I want my students to be:
I know I am not realistic.
- I want my students to be restless.
- I want them to not be content on what they have.
- I want them to have a desire to achieve more/bigger/better/sooner/now/grand/
- I want them to bug me for more time, for more resources, for more (research) problems
- I want them to email me or call me at odd hours when they get to a solution and have a Eureka! moment.
- I want them to be self-driven and motivated so that they can come up with their own (research)problems to solve and solutions to those problems that no one has ever thought about.
- I want them to write more papers, give more presentations, give more talks, go to more conferences, write and distribute more code, be better, hungrier, faster, stronger than any one else
- I want them to be organized and neurotic with scheduling their work in most optimized form possible with their circumstances
- I want them to dream big and I want them to pursue that dream despite all odds. (It is no fun to pursue a dream if the odds are not against you)
- I just want the list to have ten elements so that I can say that these are the ten commandments that I want in my students.
I know I am not realistic.
Tuesday, October 7, 2014
vibrating office
I have a nice office. Atleast I think it is nice because it is big and has good light. However, it vibrates !. Yes, you have heard it right...it vibrates from the HVAC that is installed on the top of the room.
I have requested to change my office but that might take time. The room that they showed me is much smaller than my current room. So I have a tradeoff between big room that vibrates and a small room that is quite. I will opt for the latter since a vibrating room is too annoying.
In other news I am working on a grant, a paper, home works for my undergrad class and of course lectures. I like it when I am busy.
I have requested to change my office but that might take time. The room that they showed me is much smaller than my current room. So I have a tradeoff between big room that vibrates and a small room that is quite. I will opt for the latter since a vibrating room is too annoying.
In other news I am working on a grant, a paper, home works for my undergrad class and of course lectures. I like it when I am busy.
Thursday, September 11, 2014
Am I suppose to please?
I am fairly collaborative and in general am in the favor of collaboration when it is in mutual interest of both parties.
I had a grant submission that was based on my previous work of 4 years. I wanted to submit a grant based on the preliminary results that I had. Note that the sub-field is different from my graduate adviser and also from my post-doctoral adviser.
Therefore, I gathered all the energy and spent 3 to 4 months of polishing my grant (which was not funded by the way because of one bad review).
Before the submission, I had a senior colleague pointed to me that if I want to submit she is willing to collaborate. I didn't see a point in collaboration since I had all the expertise and results that were needed. Therefore I went alone.
Ah, just to point out this is the same person who stole one of my idea (that was all mine; was not a result of a discussion) and made a PhD student started working on it (with another collaborator). She is very senior and well funded and has a lot of political power in the department. This is at least what I think.
Now I am getting a cold shoulder on various aspects from her. What I am suppose to do. Do I need to please my senior colleagues so that they don't vote against me in my tenure case? or am I suppose to do what I think is good for me and keep on doing what I do best.
I had a grant submission that was based on my previous work of 4 years. I wanted to submit a grant based on the preliminary results that I had. Note that the sub-field is different from my graduate adviser and also from my post-doctoral adviser.
Therefore, I gathered all the energy and spent 3 to 4 months of polishing my grant (which was not funded by the way because of one bad review).
Before the submission, I had a senior colleague pointed to me that if I want to submit she is willing to collaborate. I didn't see a point in collaboration since I had all the expertise and results that were needed. Therefore I went alone.
Ah, just to point out this is the same person who stole one of my idea (that was all mine; was not a result of a discussion) and made a PhD student started working on it (with another collaborator). She is very senior and well funded and has a lot of political power in the department. This is at least what I think.
Now I am getting a cold shoulder on various aspects from her. What I am suppose to do. Do I need to please my senior colleagues so that they don't vote against me in my tenure case? or am I suppose to do what I think is good for me and keep on doing what I do best.
Wednesday, August 20, 2014
Are academics isolated and alone?
It has been more than 6 months since I started my TT position. For sometime I have been thinking if academics are generally isolated and/or feel alone?
For me I have been feeling this way. For one, I am much younger than other faculty members in the department and there isn't much time (or energy) that I have after my daily grind.
In general I am good with social situations and have very close friends, but none of them are in vicinity and I take a lot of time to make friends. But with the kind of work TT has loaded on my head it seems that I might not have a friend outside ( or inside) work.
It would be interesting to see what other TT people have to say about this.
For me I have been feeling this way. For one, I am much younger than other faculty members in the department and there isn't much time (or energy) that I have after my daily grind.
In general I am good with social situations and have very close friends, but none of them are in vicinity and I take a lot of time to make friends. But with the kind of work TT has loaded on my head it seems that I might not have a friend outside ( or inside) work.
It would be interesting to see what other TT people have to say about this.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)